Why the media keep getting it wrong about Obama...

Comment on The Field, 3/21-/09:

On Politico today there was a good example of how the media systematically "misunderestimate" Barack Obama: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20254.html This article piles on the supposed evidence of how President Obama is allegedly overexposed, focusing on the venues of his appearances, his "branding" or his style -- while entirely missing the cumulative content of what he is communicating. One consultant was quoted as being skeptical about Obama "betting the success of his policies so heavily on the strength of his personality," as if the President was merely engaged in a series of personal performances. Just as they did throughout 2008 during the campaign, when the political press corps and their media-consultant talking heads continually criticized Obama for supposedly too-theatrical mass rallies and repetitive, boring town-hall meetings, they are paying far too much attention to the external aspects of his appearances and virtually no attention to what he is actually saying. The public doesn't merely see a presidential candidate or a president, it also listens to what's being said. On the Jay Leno show last night, Obama gave affable, concise, easily understandable but quite substantive answers to Leno's surprisingly numerous questions about the financial and economic problems facing the country. This was 20 minutes of pure, clear content, unfiltered by the disputatious egos and tendentious attitudes of White House pool reporters and political pundits, and it reached 15 million households. It was brilliant political television. We are dealing with an entirely new kind of president, for a new, far more serious time in our nation's life. The people get it. The media mavens don't.